It's Tuesday...and you know what that means?! I'm joining up once more with the lovely bloggers of iHomeschool Network to bring you a series of 10 posts of Top 10 lists.
Today, we are all giving 10 reasons why we chose our homeschooling method. This poses quite a conundrum for this unit study-Charlotte Mason-living literature-Thomas Jeffersonanion-Montessouri-notebooking-slightly textbooky-ECLECTIC momma. Where do I even begin in explaining myself? Except to say that I do not, personally, believe there is one method of education that is perfect for EVERY subject...for EVERY child...within EVERY family. I think they all have some excellent qualities and usefulness, but an equal amount of ineffective aspects. I choose to pick and choose...I choose to exercise my right to tailor my curriculum to suite our very unique needs.
That being said, if I had to narrow our schooling method down to one choice, I would consider The Unlikely Homeschool to be mostly Living Literature based...using REAL books, both fiction and non-fiction, as the core of our instruction materials.
So here, in no particular order, are
My Top 10 Reasons Why I Choose a Living Literature Approach.
1. Living Literature encourages a life-long love of learning. Once a child learns to read, he/she can read to learn. This method of education establishes an independent form of learning. A child who can read, can learn just about anything he/she chooses without needing the assistance of mom to plan a fun unit, a textbook to dictate subject matter, or an elaborate hands-on activity to reinforce material.
2. Living Literature promotes exploration of a particular branch of study. A topic is not limited to just a paragraph or two, as in the case of the textbook approach. If a child has a natural interest in volcanoes, he/she can read countless books about volcanic activity and never be forced to move on to the next topic simply because a textbook dictates that they must.
3. Living Literature stories are engaging because they are written by experts on the subject. Passionate writing can only come from a passionate writer. Textbook authors write on a myriad of topics and may or may not have a significant amount of interest in most, if any, of the subjects. Passionate writing breads passion from a reader. And isn't PASSION a natural catalyst for the learning process?
4. A living literature approach is easily adaptable to multi-level learning. I have five kids. It would be virtually impossible to teach five different topics for every single subject. There would not be enough hours in the day. By learning with literature, every child can be exploring the SAME topic but reading a REAL book at his/her level.
5. A living literature approach can be a natural extension of all the other methods of teaching/learning. Great books can be added to enhance a unit study, information in a textbook, a hands-on project, etc.
6. Living literature can teach a child "how" to think, not "what" to think. By reading a multitude of books on a subject, a child can get many perspectives/opinions on the same subject and make an educated assumption/conclusion about the given information.
7. Reading quality, well-written works will ALWAYS encourage good writing and communication skills. I believe that teaching great language skills should be THE MOST IMPORTANT academic goal for any homeschool parent. Math, science, history...are all worthwhile endeavors. But, there is not a single life scenario that could not benefit from good oral and written communication skills. By reading superior literary works, a child can learn communication skills by good example.
8. A living literature approach is budget-friendly. A library card is the only requirement.
9. Living literature promotes natural learning. While reading about one topic, a child might come upon information about another topic of interest...which might eventually lead to a third topic to study. It is a natural progression of thought instead of a forced sequence, as is the case of a textbook style of learning.
10. At the risk of making a teaching style into a spiritual decision, I believe Christ gave many wonderful endorsements of living literature in Scripture. He was a natural story teller and often used parables to teach a lesson. A parable is the verbal counterpart of written literature.
I still hold fast to my ECLECTIC educational program, but if forced to choose one particular teaching method over another, I am confident that a Living Literature approach is the most well-rounded form of learning.
Don't miss next week's Top 10. In the meantime, head over to
Many Little Blessings to read about the benefits of other educational styles.
Are you a Living Literature Homeschool? If not, what works best for you and yours?